This week, crypto market analysis platform Santiment ventured into the long-running drama that has been EOS’ Ether selloff. For weeks, observers have been speculating about the motives of Block.one, the developer of EOS, as they have transferred over USD 1 billion worth of ETH out of their contribution address and to exchange wallets.
Was it a tactic to depress the price of ETH, or were they simply liquidating from their initial coin offering (ICO) to begin work on the project? Santiment isn’t sure, but it has some data to further the conversation.
According to a statement, the SANbase tool has measured EOS “spending” 1,479,920 ETH in the last 30 days. Spend, on that platform, is a metric that refers to the amount of ETH transferred out of project-owned wallet addresses. Therefore, we don’t know if it was actually liquidated into fiat or spent in any other way from those destination wallets.
Santiment acknowledges the “conspiracy” theory that EOS was attempting to depress the price of ETH to further their own platform, then quickly dispels that idea.
They acknowledge that it is entirely possible the Block.one team was simply cashing in some of the massive ICO they’re about to wrap up. “EOS launched their Dawn 3.0 pre-release on Github in early April and their ICO is coming to a close in the beginning of June, coinciding with their mainnet launch,” Santiment said in the statement.
Additionally, according to Token Report data, Block.one has previously committed USD 1 billion to EOS’s venture partnership program. That’s another plausible outlet for the cash.
Most damning to the notion of subversive tactics is the fact that none of the ETH dump actually moved the price of the token. Santiment noted that “trading volumes and prices on the exact days of the largest ETH spends (03/22, 04/05, and 04/19) by EOS were largely unaffected. It doesn’t appear that the ETH price has been depressed by this action, given its increase by ~60 percent in value since the beginning of April.”
Was Block.one attempting to sabotage the currency that still denominates more than half of their massive ICO? If they were, the maneuver failed… to the tune of USD 1 billion in the bank.
- SingularityNET Launches $100 Million Industry Initiative to Fund and Support AI Blockchain Projects - May 25, 2018
- Bitmain Bets $110 Million That Circle Can Create the One True Stablecoin - May 17, 2018
- Is EOS Dumping Ether? Market Analyst Santiment Thinks Not - May 14, 2018
- Constellation Sets out to Build Fast, Scalable Blockchain Using DAG - April 17, 2018
- Monex Buys Post-Hack Coincheck for $33.5M, Aims For Eventual IPO - April 9, 2018
- Award-Winning Eligma Announces $24M ICO To Unify Online Shopping - April 5, 2018
- Algebraix Launches Public Token Sale With Help From CoinList API - March 29, 2018
- ALAX and Gionee Partner to Bring Mobile Gaming to the World’s Underbanked - March 22, 2018
- Havven Raises $30m for USD-Pegged Stablecoin Network - March 2, 2018
- iOlite Launches Foundation and ICO to Democratize Smart Contracts - March 2, 2018
- Australia’s Shping Launches Token to Change How Advertisers Reach Consumers - February 26, 2018
- HelloGold’s GOLDX: World’s First Shariah-Compliant Crypto Asset - February 21, 2018
- Waltonchain and Loci Announce Partnership to Unite Intellectual Property With IoT - February 19, 2018
- Fibonacci Launches ICO to Revolutionize Hydroponic Cannabis Farming - February 14, 2018
- Viewly Presents Ad-Free Video Content With $12m Token Sale - February 6, 2018